Shortening of Archaean and Paleoproterozoic continental lithospheres: large strains, but no orogeny

Denis Gapais

doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1496

Abstract

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shortening of Archaean and Paleoproterozoic continental lithospheres: large strains, but no orogeny&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Denis Gapais&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, Jonathan Poh&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, Philippe Yamato&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, Thibault Duretz&lt;sup&gt;1,&lt;/sup&gt; Florence Cagnard&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;(1) G&amp;#233;osciences Rennes, UMR CNRS 6118, Universit&amp;#233; de Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes cedex, France&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;(2) Bureau de Recherche G&amp;#233;ologique et mini&amp;#232;re, 3 avenue Claude-Guillemin, BP 36009 45060 Orl&amp;#233;ans Cedex 2, France&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Denis.gapais@univ-rennes1.fr, jonathanpoh87@gmail.com, philippe.yamato@gmail.com, thibault.duretz@univ-rennes1.fr, f.cagnard@brgm.fr&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In many ancient deformation belts of Archaean and Paleoproterozoic age (e.g. Terre Ad&amp;#233;lie in East Antarctica, Finnish Svecofennides in Southern Finland, Murchison Belt in South Africa, Thompson Nickel Belt in Manitoba, Dharwar Craton in western India, Abitibi sub-Province in Qu&amp;#233;bec, Trans-Hudson belt of Canada, Trans-Amazonian belt of Suriname), latest recorded deformations are compressive or transpressive. In these belts that involved hot and weak continental crusts, deformations are distributed with basically vertical tectonics and important crustal thickening. On the other hand, there is no evidence of syn-orogenic extension or late-orogenic collapse, as classically observed in modern orogens where extensional detachments are widespread.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Analogue and numerical models emphasize that shortening of weak and hot lithospheres basically favour downward motions, which result in limited topographies. Field evidence further point to metamorphic isogrades rather parallel to the Earth surface at belt scale. Hence, metamorphic conditions are rather monotonous at the scale of individual belts, with limited metamorphic jumps and typical P-T paths with no significant adiabatic retrograde segments. Consistently, localized deep detrital sedimentary basins like foreland or intra-mountain basins, are not documented. Sedimentary records rather suggest distributed sedimentation processes. In addition, several lines of evidence tend to point out that cooling of ancient hot deformation belts was rather slow, which is consistent with distributed topographies and long-lasting erosion-driven exhumation processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;On these bases, we propose that gravity-driven collapse had no reason to occur in ancient hot deformation belts because important topographic gradients and orogeny could not develop as observed in modern mountain chains.&lt;/p&gt;

Full Text