Abstract

The functional visual acuity test which is the average of the visual acuities measured during a specific time frame (standard, 60 seconds) has been used recently to assess the visual function in various conditions. The availability of a shorter version of the functional visual acuity test promises to be patient friendly in that it is a simple screening test performed in a shorter period of time than the standard test. The results of measurements of the FVA test between the 30-second measurement time (short-version FVA test) and the standard 60-second measurement are compared, and the feasibility of the short-version FVA test instead of the standard FVA test is investigated. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (25 men and 3 women) were enrolled in this prospective observational study. All subjects underwent measurement of the binocular distance-corrected visual acuity and the binocular distance-corrected FVA with the 60-second and 30-second measurement times. The interchangeability of the corrected-distance FVA, maximal VA, visual maintenance ratio, and average response time in the short-version and the standard FVA tests was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method, and the results showed agreements of the two tests except for the minimal VA. The short-version FVA test is equivalent to the standard method except for evaluating the visual acuity fluctuations and promises to be a simple visual screening test that can be performed in a shorter time.

Highlights

  • E functional visual acuity test, which first was developed to detect impaired visual function in dry eye syndrome, [2] is the average of the visual acuities measured during a specific time frame and has been used recently to assess the visual function in various conditions [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. ese studies showed that the functional visual acuity is more sensitive for detecting changes in visual function than the conventional visual acuity and can evaluate the visual function in daily life more precisely

  • We compared the results of the functional visual acuity test obtained using a 30-second measurement time with the standard 60-second functional visual acuity test and Journal of Ophthalmology investigated the feasibility of using the short-version functional visual acuity test instead of the standard functional visual acuity test

  • We compared the results of the shortversion functional visual acuity test with those of the standard test. e results of the two tests showed agreement except for the minimal VA, which suggested that the shortversion FVA test might be a more useful screening tool for measuring visual function than the standard FVA test because of the shorter measurement time

Read more

Summary

Methods

Comparisons of the corrected-distance functional visual acuity, maximal visual acuity, minimal visual acuity, visual maintenance ratio, and average response time in the 30-second and 60-second groups were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was used to study correlations among the distance-corrected functional visual acuity, maximal visual acuity, minimal visual acuity, visual maintenance ratio, and average response time in each group. (c) A representative printout of the results of the FVA test using the short-version method in the same subject as in B FVA (logMAR), − 0.10; visual maintenance ratio, 0.95; maximal/minimal logMAR visual acuities, − 0.18/0.00, respectively; average response time, 1.30 seconds.

Discussion
Findings
Conflicts of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call