Abstract
BackgroundThe value of time to positivity (TTP) on diagnosis for catheter-related bloodstream infection and distinguishment on bacteria group and infection source has been investigated. However, the relationship between TTP and patient outcome requires verification, and we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science for publications associated with the topic. We included studies that researched the TTP on predicting patient mortality and septic shock. Quality assessment is performed with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). The analysis is performed using Review Manager Version 5.0.24. on articles available for data extraction on the exact population of each outcome group. The existence of publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochran Q and {I}^{2} statistics. The outcome is reported as an odds ratio. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021272286.ResultsTwenty-four eligible studies were included in our study. Twenty-four in the mortality group and six in the septic shock group. Mortality is significantly associated with the short time to positivity group with an odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI: 2.25–3.96, p-value < 0.001). The odds ratio for developing septic shock in the short TTP group is 4.06 (95% CI: 2.41–6.84, p-value < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed short TTP as a significant predictor of mortality and septic shock in Gram's positive and Gram's negative related bloodstream infections. TTP is not associated with mortality among patients with candidaemia.ConclusionsShort time to positivity is a reliable marker for patient outcome in certain bacterial species. Studies concerning confounding factors such as the delay in bottle loading and other confounding factors are needed to enhance external validity.
Highlights
The value of time to positivity (TTP) on diagnosis for catheter-related bloodstream infection and distin‐ guishment on bacteria group and infection source has been investigated
TTP was reported to be helpful with differential diagnosis of catheterrelated bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) [3], salvaging central venous catheters [4], and prognosis prediction for infective endocarditis [5]
A total of forty-six full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility, and twenty-four studies that met our search criteria with eligible quality were included in the analysis
Summary
The value of time to positivity (TTP) on diagnosis for catheter-related bloodstream infection and distin‐ guishment on bacteria group and infection source has been investigated. The relationship between TTP and patient outcome requires verification, and we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Most of the studies faced limitations such as small study populations, uncontrolled confounders, and differentiation between centers [10]. These hurdles make the implementation of TTP impractical. We aim to clarify the relationship between TTP and patient outcome, test the robustness of TTP as a predictor in patient outcome, and overcome the limitation of population size in current articles by performing a systemic review and meta-analysis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.