Abstract
BackgroundTherapeutic ultrasound (US) is used for a variety of clinical pathologies and is thought to accelerate tissue repair and help with pain reduction via its thermal and nonthermal effects. The evidence on physiological effects of US on both sensory and vascular functions in humans is incomplete. Hence, the purpose of this study was to determine the short-term impact of two doses of US (3 MHz, 1:4, 0.25 W/cm2, 5 min; 1 MHz, continuous, 0.8 W/cm2, 3 min), on sensory and vascular responses in the healthy forearms.MethodsTwenty healthy subjects were recruited (mean age, 29.6 ± 8.8 years) for the study. Superficial blood flow (SBF) in the distal forearms was determined using the tissue viability imaging system. Sensory perception thresholds (SPT) were determined from ring finger (C7, C8) to assess A-beta (at 2,000 Hz) and C fiber function (at 5 Hz), using a Neurometer CPT/C device. Subject’s two hands were randomly allocated to group order (AB/BA). Scores were obtained before and immediately after the application of US and control. Differences in these were analyzed using repeated measures.ResultsBoth 3 MHz pulsed US and 1 MHz continuous US showed small to moderate (effect size = 0.12 to 0.68), statistically significant reductions in SBF (3 MHz, mean change = 2.8 AU and 1 MHz, mean change = 3.9 AU, p < 0.05 respectively), skin temperature (2.5°C and 1.1°C, p < 0.05), and SPT at 5 Hz (1.3 and 1 mA, p < 0.05) across time. SPT at 2,000 Hz remained unaltered by all three conditions (p > 0.05). Age and gender also had no effect on all outcome measures (p > 0.05).ConclusionThis study demonstrated minor reductions in skin blood flow, skin temperatures, and C fiber perception thresholds immediately after 3 MHz, and 1 MHz US. The responses observed may have been due to a thermo-cooling effect of the gel or due to the direct effect of US on C fibers of median and ulnar nerves. US had a negligible effect on A-beta fibres. This would suggest that future studies looking at physiological effects of US should move towards investigating larger dosages and study the effects in patient populations.
Highlights
Therapeutic ultrasound (US) is used for a variety of clinical pathologies and is thought to accelerate tissue repair and help with pain reduction via its thermal and nonthermal effects
The group means, standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI), effect size (ES), and change scores (CS) for skin blood flow, skin temperature, and sensory perception thresholds at 2,000 and 5 Hz are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and are summarized by outcome measure in the following
Sensory perception threshold at 2,000 Hz from ring finger No significant difference in sensory perception threshold at 2,000 Hz was observed in the ultrasound or control, across the time points
Summary
Therapeutic ultrasound (US) is used for a variety of clinical pathologies and is thought to accelerate tissue repair and help with pain reduction via its thermal and nonthermal effects. The tissue response to nonthermal ultrasound includes different musculoskeletal conditions [4,8,9,10,17,18] has questioned the traditional view of its therapeutic benefits [10]. Several reviews report disagreement and confusion about the most efficacious treatment parameters for US [4,6,8,9,10,17,18,20] Despite this lack of strong evidence, previous reports on US usage in the form of questionnaires and surveys have shown that US is being used frequently in the physiotherapy clinical practice for musculoskeletal conditions [9,21,22,23,25]. Dosage is based on the theoretical rationale, there are insufficient dosage trials to define the optimal dosage of ultrasound across different conditions [4,6,9,19,21]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
