Short-term impact of cardiovascular screening by traditional risk assessment or coronary artery calcium score on health-related quality of life: the ROBINSCA trial

Abstract

Abstract Aims Evidence on the impact of screening for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important for policy decisions about screening implementation and to uncover teachable moments to motivate healthy lifestyle choices. It is unknown whether screening by cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan has a stronger impact on HRQoL than screening by traditional risk prediction models. The study aims to investigate differences in HRQoL across the screening process between participants who were randomized to CVD-risk estimation by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score or Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). Methods and results A subset of 2687 ROBINSCA participants filled in questionnaires at (T0) randomization (T1) invitation (T2) 1-3 days before screening (T3) 1-3 days after and (T4) screening result. Generic HRQoL (SF-12; EQ-5D) and anxiety (STAI-6) were measured. We investigated the differences in changes in HRQoL across the screening process with linear mixed models. We found comparable levels of HRQoL at all screening moments for the two intervention groups. Mental health scores were worse at invitation and randomization than at the later time points, irrespective of screening group (all p < 0.001). A result indicating a heightened CVD-risk was associated with increased anxiety in the CT screening group. Conclusion CT-screening for CVD-risk has no detrimental impact on HRQoL and anxiety levels compared to screening by traditional risk assessment. Receiving an invitation to screenning or a result implying increased CVD-risk could function as teachable moments for high-risk individuals.