Abstract
We report empirical evidence regarding the disciplining role of different institutional and other owners in reducing managerial myopia. Using data from a large Nordic survey, we find that companies to a reasonably high degree feel that external pressure for a good result in the short-term generates conflict with the company’s long-term goals. We test for the effect of several ownership types, and find that especially a large private equity owner is able to significantly reduce perceived pressure for short-term actions. We also find support for a behavioral characteristic: younger managers feel significantly more pressure. Firms subject to higher pressure undertake more actions to accommodate that pressure. Again, the impact of especially a large private equity owner is beneficial because such firms undertake significantly less often actions that are likely to destroy value, such as deprioritizing their long-term investments or R&D.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.