Abstract

Objective This article evaluates the success of prosthetic rehabilitation of thin wiry ridge and implants placed simultaneously in splitted ridge both clinically and radiographically. Materials and Methods Twenty-one participants were enrolled of which 13 patients (8 females and 5 males) were suffering from maxillary ridge atrophy and 8 patients (5 females and 3 males) had mandibular ridge atrophy; a total of 42 implants were performed using the ridge expansion technique. The expansion was performed using the conventional disk technique, piezoelectric corticotomy, and self-threading expanders. Implants were placed and loaded with fixed partial denture after 4 months for the mandible and 6 months for the maxilla. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured at T0 (implant placement) and TL (loading). Crestal bone levels were measured at different times: T0, TL, and T12 (12 months). Evaluation of prosthetic and surgical complications was carried out. Data were analyzed and compared using analysis of variance and paired t -tests at a significance level of 5%. Results All implants met the criteria for success. All implants showed a higher mean bone loss from T0 to TL (1.259 ± 0.3020) than from TL to T12 (0.505 ± 0.163) with a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.0001). ISQ values sharply increased at the time of loading (72.52 ± 2.734) than at implant insertion (44.5 ± 4.062) with a significant difference ( p < 0.0001). Minor prosthetic and surgical complications were reported. Conclusion The results from this study support the efficacy of prosthetic rehabilitation of thin wiry ridge using split ridge technique and the success of implants placed simultaneously in splitted ridge.

Highlights

  • The results from this study support the efficacy of prosthetic rehabilitation of thin wiry ridge using split ridge technique and the success of implants placed simultaneously in splitted ridge

  • Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillary and mandibular thin partially edentulous ridge areas represents a challenging procedure that is difficult to be restored by removable prosthesis, tooth-supported fixed partial dentures, and implant-supported prosthesis

  • This study aimed to evaluate the success of the prosthetic rehabilitation of thin wiry ridge and evaluate implants placed simultaneously in splitted ridge both clinically and radiographically

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillary and mandibular thin partially edentulous ridge areas represents a challenging procedure that is difficult to be restored by removable prosthesis, tooth-supported fixed partial dentures, and implant-supported prosthesis. Increasing the ridge width could be of value in improving prosthetic rehabilitation. Expansion techniques of thin ridges were used as a form of preprosthetic surgery for improving the support of partial and complete dentures. In order to ensure a successful outcome of implants, a minimum thickness of 1 to 1.5 mm of bone should be present on both buccal and lingual/palatal aspects of the implant(s), that is, a minimum of 6 to 7 mm bone width is required for placement of an implant with a diameter of 3.5 to 4 mm.[2,3,4] Narrow alveolar ridges remain a severe challenge for placement of implants using the prosthetic-driven concept rather than bone-driven one for successful prosthetic rehabilitation regarding both the function and esthetics.[5,6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call