Abstract

PurposeTo compare the short-term efficacy in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) treated using either aflibercept or conbercept.MethodsThis prospective study included 41 patients with treatment-naive PCV (42 eyes). All the patients were treated with either aflibercept or conbercept using an initial series of 3 monthly loading injections. Changes in the best-corrected logMAR visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic outcomes were evaluated at 3 months.ResultsBCVA was improved with reduction in central choroidal thickness (CCT), central foveal thickness (CFT), and subretinal fluid (SRF) after 3 monthly loading injections in both aflibercept (IVA) and conbercept (IVC) groups. There was no significant difference in either visual or anatomic outcomes between the two groups after 3 months of treatment. However, compared with the IVC group, significantly higher BCVA improvement was observed in the patients in the IVA group with baseline BCVA better than 1. A visual outcome improved ≥3 lines in 13 patients in the IVA group (59%), and 9 patients in the IVC group (45%). A relatively high proportion of polyp regression was observed in the IVA group (63%) compared with the IVC group (55%) via OCTA.ConclusionsVisual and anatomic outcomes were significantly improved in both IVA and IVC groups, but the results suggest a potentially superior short-term response in the IVA group.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call