Short-term analysis of uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery via the subxiphoid approach without chest tube drainage for anterior mediastinal tumors: a comparative retrospective study.

Abstract

BackgroundUniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) via the subxiphoid approach has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for anterior mediastinal tumors. However, there is limited evidence of the necessity of chest tubes and the comparative efficacy with other approaches.MethodsA total of 141 patients with anterior mediastinal tumors receiving VATS were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into the lateral approach (LA) group, the uniport subxiphoid approach (USA) group, and the three-port subxiphoid approach (TSA) group. Short-term analysis including operation time, chest tube rates, drainage duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and hospital stay were compared. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to evaluate the amount of pleural effusion.ResultsThere was no significant difference in demographic and baseline characteristics among the three groups (all P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay of the subxiphoid approach group were significantly lower than the LA group (P<0.001). The postoperative CT scans demonstrated that the USA group had a similar amount of pleural effusion as the other groups (P=0.1605). The postoperative VAS score of the USA group was significantly lower than the other groups (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in complications, in-hospital death, and conversion to thoracotomy among the three groups (all P>0.05).ConclusionsVATS via the subxiphoid approach is less invasive, equally safe, and same effective for anterior mediastinal tumors than the LA. The chest tube could be omitted for the USA.