Abstract
Stroke survivors adopt cautious or compensatory strategies for safe and successful obstacle crossing. Although knee extensor spasticity is a common independent secondary sensorimotor disorder post-stroke, few studies have examined the step adjustment and compensatory strategies used by stroke survivors with knee extensor spasticity during obstacle crossing. This study aimed to compare the differences in the kinematics and kinetics during obstacle crossing between stroke survivors with and without knee extensor spasticity, and to identify knee extensor spasticity-related differences in step adjustment and compensatory strategies. Twenty stroke subjects were divided into a spasticity group [n = 11, modified Ashworth scale (MAS) ≥ 1] and a non-spasticity group (n = 9, MAS = 0), based on the MAS score of the knee extensor. Subjects were instructed to walk at a self-selected speed on a 10-m walkway and step over a 15 cm obstacle. A ten-camera 3D motion analysis system and two force plates were used to collect the kinematic and kinetic data. During the pre-obstacle phase, stroke survivors with knee extensor spasticity adopted a short-step strategy to approach the obstacle, while the subjects without spasticity used long-step strategy. During the affected limb swing phase, the spasticity group exhibited increased values that were significantly higher than those seen in the non-spasticity group for the following measurements: pelvic lateral tilt angle, trunk lateral tilt angle, medio-lateral distance between the ankle and ipsilateral hip joint, hip work contributions, the inclination angles between center of mass and center of pressure in anterior–posterior and medio-lateral directions. These results indicate that the combined movement of the pelvic, trunk lateral tilt, and hip abduction is an important compensatory strategy for successful obstacle crossing, but it sacrifices some balance in the sideways direction. During the post-obstacle phase, short-step and increase step width strategy were adopted to reestablish the walking pattern and balance control. These results reveal the step adjustment and compensatory strategies for obstacle crossing and also provide insight into the design of rehabilitation interventions for fall prevention in stroke survivors with knee extensor spasticity.
Highlights
Stroke often results in spasticity and associated motor impairments in the lower limbs, including muscle weakness (Li et al, 2014), proprioceptive deficit (Gorst et al, 2019), abnormal agonist-antagonist coactivation (Trumbower et al, 2010), and altered inter-joint and inter-segmental coordination (Subramanian et al, 2018; Salehi et al, 2020)
Knee extensor spasticity is a common and independent secondary sensorimotor disorder post-stroke, few studies have examined the step adjustment and compensatory strategies used by stroke survivors with knee extensor spasticity during obstacle crossing
The purpose of this study was to systematically examine the step adjustment and compensatory strategies used by stroke survivors with knee extensor spasticity during obstacle crossing
Summary
Stroke often results in spasticity and associated motor impairments in the lower limbs, including muscle weakness (Li et al, 2014), proprioceptive deficit (Gorst et al, 2019), abnormal agonist-antagonist coactivation (Trumbower et al, 2010), and altered inter-joint and inter-segmental coordination (Subramanian et al, 2018; Salehi et al, 2020). Spasticity is not just an independent disorder, it has a negative effect on other motor disorders. One previous study demonstrated that spasticity affects passive tissue stiffness and disrupts the agonist-antagonist activation pattern, which alters the net effect of the forces generated by the muscle groups (Singer et al, 2013). Community ambulation tasks, such as obstacle crossing, can be more challenging for stroke survivors with lower limb spasticity than for those without (Soyuer and Ozturk, 2007)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.