Abstract
Much empirical research has been conducted concerning the effect of short-selling on market quality and volatility. However, the evidence is inconclusive and still a matter of debate. Using intraday data in a pure order-driven market we show that allowing for short-selling decreases the adverse selection costs for less-visible firms, firms with less analyst coverage, larger adverse-selection cost component of the bid-ask spread, low price per share, and high relative tick size (given the same market capitalization). Allowing for short-selling also decreases (increases) intraday volatility for less- (more-) visible stocks. In addition we document that with the uptick rule in place (not in place) there is not statistically significant difference in liquidity (intraday volatility) between stocks that are allowed for short-selling and those that are not.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
