Abstract

Increasing loss of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes is often debated in the bioenergy context, especially with respect to non-traditional crops that can be grown for energy production in the future. As promising renewable energy source and additional landscape element, the potential role of short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations to biodiversity is of great interest. We studied plant species richness in eight landscapes (225 km2) containing willow and poplar SRC plantations (1,600 m2) in Sweden and Germany, and the related SRC α-diversity to species richness in the landscapes (γ-diversity). Using matrix variables, spatial analyses of SRC plantations and landscapes were performed to explain the contribution of SRC α-diversity to γ-diversity. In accordance with the mosaic concept, multiple regression analyses revealed number of habitat types as a significant predictor for species richness: the higher the habitat type number, the higher the γ-diversity and the lower the proportion of SRC plantation α-diversity to γ-diversity. SRC plantation α-diversity was 6.9 % (±1.7 % SD) of species richness on the landscape scale. The contribution of SRC plantations increased with decreasing γ-diversity. SRC plantations were dominated more by species adapted to frequent disturbances and anthropo-zoogenic impacts than surrounding landscapes. We conclude that by providing habitats for plants with different requirements, SRC α-diversity has a significant share on γ-diversity in rural areas and can promote diversity in landscapes with low habitat heterogeneity and low species pools. However, plant diversity enrichment is mainly due to additional species typically present in disturbed and anthropogenic environments.

Highlights

  • Against the background of global biodiversity loss largely caused by intensive agriculture [1,2,3,4,5], the diversity of entire agricultural landscapes, the γ-diversity, is of great research interest

  • Our results show that short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations provide habitats for plants with different requirements and thereby have a significant share on γ-diversity

  • The number of habitat types and the species number in a landscape can be used to predict the contribution of SRC plantations to vascular plant diversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Against the background of global biodiversity loss largely caused by intensive agriculture [1,2,3,4,5], the diversity of entire agricultural landscapes, the γ-diversity, is of great research interest. The γ-diversity addresses the species diversity of a landscape with more than one kind of natural community, and it includes the diversity within (α-diversity) and among communities (β-diversity, terminology of Whittaker [6]). Many scientific papers address the question of the importance of structural heterogeneity in agricultural landscapes and agree that landscape heterogeneity is beneficial for biodiversity [i.e. 8–12]. According to Forman [13], a matrix of large patches of plant communities supplemented with small patches scattered throughout the Bioenerg. (2012) 5:573–583 landscape characterizes an optimum landscape as small patches provide different benefits for biodiversity compared to large patches Res. (2012) 5:573–583 landscape characterizes an optimum landscape as small patches provide different benefits for biodiversity compared to large patches

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call