Abstract

This study investigated the short- and long-term effects of dental adhesives doped with nano-sized bioactive glass 45S5 (BAG) on the resin–dentin interfacial bond strength. Two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (ASB) and Solobond Plus (SB)) and one self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond (CF)) were doped with different concentrations of BAG (5, 10, and 20 wt%). The unmodified (0 wt% BAG) commercial adhesives served as control groups. Dentin of 120 molars (n = 10 per group) was treated with the different adhesives, followed by buildups with a conventional composite restorative material. From each tooth, 14 sticks were prepared for micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. The sticks were stored in simulated body fluid at 37 °C and tested after 24 h or six months for µTBS and failure mode. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis tests in combination with post-hoc Conover-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at a level of significance of α = 0.05. After 24 h and six months, both etch-and-rinse adhesives with a low BAG content (up to 10 wt% for ASB and 5 wt% for SB) showed similar µTBSs as their respective control groups (0 wt% BAG). CF showed a significant decrease in µTBS even after addition of 5 wt% BAG. At a high concentration of added BAG (20 wt%), all three adhesives showed a significant decrease in µTBS compared to the unmodified controls. The CF control group showed significantly lower µTBS after 6 months of storage than after 24 h. In contrast, the µTBS of all CF groups modified with BAG was unaffected by aging. In conclusion, the tested etch-and-rinse adhesives can be modified with up to 5 wt% (SB), or 10 wt% (ASB) of BAG without reducing their short- and long-term dentin bond strength. Moreover, the addition of nano-sized BAG may prevent long-term bond strength deterioration of a self-etch adhesive.

Highlights

  • For the etch-and-rinse adhesives (ASB and Solobond Plus (SB)), no significant differences in μTBS were observed after 24 h between the control group and the groups modified with 5–10 wt% of bioactive glass 45S5 (BAG)

  • After 6 months of storage, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (ASB) with 5 and 10 wt% BAG (ASB-5 and ASB-10), and SB with 5 wt% BAG (SB-5) revealed no significant μTBS differences compared to their respective control groups

  • After 24 h and six months, both etch-and-rinse adhesives modified with 20 wt% of BAG (ASB-20 and SB-20) showed significantly lower μTBS values compared to the control groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For more than 60 years, resin composites have offered an increasing range of indications compared to previous nonadhesive restoration materials [1,2,3]. Resin composites have become the most widely used restorative materials in dentistry [4]. Maintaining a durable interface between the tooth tissue and the restorative material remains a challenge [5]. The loss of interfacial integrity can lead to marginal gaps with associated postoperative sensitivity, marginal discoloration, and formation of secondary caries [6]. Major failures of adhesive bonding can lead to the loss of the restoration [7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call