Abstract

Implementation of Council of Australian Governments (COAG) and State based water reform initiatives are likely to create significant structural adjustment pressures in irrigation areas throughout the Murray Darling Basin. There are concerns about the adequacy of short run models in both analyzing the impacts of these reforms and capturing the responses of irrigators to structural adjustment pressures. The legitimacy of these concerns are explored in this paper. A long run specification of the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area has been developed, against which the short-run regional linear programming model developed by Jones and Fagan (1996) is compared. A range of policy settings are examined under these alternative specifications to investigate the level of divergence between the two approaches. This information provides an indication of the importance of accommodating strategic longer term changes in resource allocation in analyzing the impact of water reforms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.