Abstract

We present results of configuration-interaction (CI) computations of wavefunctions and of properties of the first two singlet states, X(1)Σ(+) and A(1)Π, of the, as yet unobserved, BeMg polar molecule, for internuclear distances in the range [2.5-1000] Å. The X(1)Σ(+) state is very weakly bound, (D(e) = 469.4 cm(-1) at R(e) = 3.241 Å), whereas the A(1)Π state, which correlates with the excited dissociation channel [Mg KL3s3p(1)P(o) + Be 1s(2)2s(2) (1)S], is bound rather strongly (D(e) = 19 394 cm(-1) (55.5 kcal/mol) at R(e) = 2.385 Å). The X(1)Σ(+) state supports 12 vibrational levels, for which vibrationally averaged dipole moments, <μ>(υ), were obtained, while 71 vibrational levels were found for A(1)Π. For the level (X(1)Σ(+)), <μ>(0) = 0.213 D. The υ(") = 7 and 8 X(1)Σ(+) vibrational levels are found to have the highest probability to be reached via emission from the lowest lying vibrational levels of A(1)Π. The work had a dual outcome: First, it explored consequences of different choices of the state-specific reference "Fermi-sea" space ("active" space), which is required for the construction and execution of the multiconfigurational "complete active space self-consistent field" calculations and the subsequent multi-reference CI calculations. In this context, comparisons with results on the weakly bound ground states of the homonuclear Be(2) and Mg(2) molecules were made. Second, it produced reliable data for the short- as well as the long-range parts of the potential energy curve (PEC). Such information is relevant to analyses concerning cold and ultra-cold Physics and Chemistry. For example, accurate fits to the X(1)Σ(+) PEC, which was computed to nano-Hartree accuracy, with account for basis-set-superposition error, produced the C(6) and C(8) dispersion coefficients as 364.3 ± 1.1 a.u. and 28 000 ± 500 a.u., respectively. The result for C(6) is in excellent agreement with that of Derevianko et al. [At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 96, 323 (2010)], (364 ± 4 a.u.), that was obtained in the framework of the theory of long-range interactions and many-body calculations on the constituent atoms. On the other hand, our result for C(8) differs from that of Standard and Certain [J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3002 (1985)] by about 7000 a.u.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.