Abstract
This research aims to compare different shoreline extraction methods in assessing shoreline variability at Arroio do Sal, Southern Brazil. The methodology included the automatic extraction of shoreline positions by CoastSat and Cassie and the manual vectorization of shorelines using two different shoreline proxies. Digital Shoreline Analysis System was used to compute the shoreline displacement for each extraction method and shoreline mission. The results were compared in terms of rates, uncertainties, and methodologies. The results show that the CoastSat lines are generally displaced towards the land, while Cassie is displaced towards the sea. To concerning shape, Cassie has a more undulating shape and a greater number of indentations, with more exaggerated features, while CoastSat has a more rectilinear line, with smoother indentations next to the washouts. The RMSE values are 8.89 m for CoastSat and 27.27 m for Cassie. Despite the variations in the coastline position between the algorithms, the analyses of the rates of change have similar trends. Both algorithms establish an erosion trend for the Sentinel lines, but with different magnitudes; for the Landsat lines, both algorithms show a stable coastline, with the same average and uncertainty. Arroio do Sal can be considered a stable coastline, with rates of change in the −0.5 m–0.5 m range. Both algorithms were able to determine this general trend.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.