Abstract
In this research, we report upon comparative measures of shopping value in the U.S. and Russian. Given the relatively limited shopping environments provided to Russian consumers, one would anticipate that the measures we examine would reflect much higher evaluations for U.S. shoppers. We inject doubt into that expectation through resort to habituation theory. Habituation theory, for which a number of articles have appeared in the 1990s reflects the belief that for emotional and physiological reactions, consumer evaluations may be subject to adaptation. Consumers exposed to relatively poor conditions may nevertheless adapt and show little difference in enjoyment than those who benefit from richer conditions. Consumers, in short, adapt to their surroundings and produce measures of evaluation that reflect their interaction with the environment. Our research results find evidence of this adaptation. Shoppers in Russia report lower ratings in the utility of their shopping systems, specifically their ability to complete a shopping task. Contrarily, their reports for hedonic values, or the pleasure derived from using their shopping systems, are similar to those in the U.S. We conclude that habituation is more likely to meaningfully affect hedonic values as compared to utilitarian. These results also suggest that the evaluation of measures of pleasure or satisfaction for consumers may need to be scrutinized carefully for evidence of the habituation effect to insure correct interpretation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.