Abstract
This article contributes to emerging research on sustainable place-making, but makes an important contribution through a strong focus on outcomes for marginalised people and the need for long-term sustainability. Sustainable place-making combines ‘place-making’ and ‘sustainable development’ to describe locally focused action working towards social, economic and environmental goals (Franklin and Marsden, 2015). The article explores an externally funded charity-led project working in a deprived area of the UK, implementing urban agriculture, community gardening and household energy activities. The project successfully engaged marginalised people, who strongly voiced outcomes including reduced isolation, improved mental health and increased resilience and self-reliance. Support from staff, volunteering in a team, enjoying gardening, accessing nature and financial savings provided a platform for impacts. Environmental outcomes were less tangible but included improvements to the local environment and reduced energy usage. However, after the funding finished, marginalised participants were vulnerable to outcomes not being sustained in the long term.
Highlights
Hull is a city in the north of England that has high levels of deprivation (ONS, 2015; Porter et al, 2015)
This article explores the case study of an externally funded charity-led project that supported marginalised people in Hull to engage in urban agriculture (UA) and community gardening, volunteering, and household energyefficiency activities, with broad aims to increase sustainable living, reduce poverty and improve the environment
Sustainable place-making includes UA, community gardening and community-level energy activities, which are increasing in the UK and globally (Holland, 2004; Crane et al, 2013; Franklin and Marsden, 2015)
Summary
This article contributes to emerging research on sustainable place-making, but makes an important contribution through a strong focus on outcomes for marginalised people and the need for long-term sustainability. The article explores an externally funded charity-led project working in a deprived area of the UK, implementing urban agriculture, community gardening and household energy activities. The project successfully engaged marginalised people, who strongly voiced outcomes including reduced isolation, improved mental health and increased resilience and self-reliance. Environmental outcomes were less tangible but included improvements to the local environment and reduced energy usage. After the funding finished, marginalised participants were vulnerable to outcomes not being sustained in the long term. Key words sustainable place-making long-term sustainability marginalised people . (2020) Shoots and leaves: exploring the impacts and fragile sustainability of sustainable place-making projects working with marginalised people, Voluntary To cite this article: Ramsden, S. (2020) Shoots and leaves: exploring the impacts and fragile sustainability of sustainable place-making projects working with marginalised people, Voluntary
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have