Abstract
Crown defoliation, is a product of the tree crown status from the past several years of growth, which can be misleading if used as a stress indicator when assessing current Norway spruce vitality. To evaluate recovery processes in previously damaged trees a newly developed macroscopic indicator based on proportions of bud development types was investigated. In 1998 and 1999, 474 mature Norway spruce trees were sampled for macroscopic measurements, 293 trees for tree-ring increments and 40 trees for study of metabolic markers (concentration of chlorophylls, phenolic compounds and lignin). Study sites were located in the Czech Republic, in the Sumava Mts, a relatively unpolluted and undisturbed area, and in the Krusne hory Mts, which exhibited a whole range of tree damage corresponding to a gradient of increasing air pollution load. Three categories of trees were identified which reflect current levels of intensity of shoot formation and capacity to replace potential needle loss by activation of buds with growth potential: accelerated, stabilized and decreased shoot growth. Relative to sink prioritization, we concluded that the highest vitality occurred in trees with stabilized shoot growth and the lowest vitality in trees with accelerated shoot growth. In conifers, the amount of allocated assimilates to low priority carbon sinks (such as stem growth, production of protective chemical compounds and reproductive organs) depends on what is remaining from the shoot growth processes which are of the highest priority. Significant inverse relationships were found between the intensity of shoot growth, tree-ring increments, production of reproductive organs and concentration of phenolic compounds in the needles. The highest allocation of assimilates to crown recovery occurred in trees with crown defoliation of 50–69% indicating forest recovery was observed in the most heavily damaged areas impacted by air pollution in the past. The present criterion of bud development types has potential for forestry management applications as it is easily applied in the field and, in contrast with standard forestry measurement of crown defoliation, it reflects accurately tree recovery and decline processes under multiple stress impacts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.