Abstract

Among weeds, morning glories comprise a very important group of climbing plants that infest sugarcane crops. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shoot and root interference of Merremia cissoides on the initial growth of sugarcane cultivar RB 966928. The experiment consisted of five treatment groups: (i) sugarcane monocropping, (ii) morning glory monocropping, (iii) sugarcane intertwined with morning glory but inseparate boxes, (iv) sugarcane intertwined with morning glory in attached boxes and (v) sugarcane with morning glory in attached boxes with morning glory prevented from intertwining with the sugarcane. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks with four replicates. Merremia cissoides adversely affected the initial growth of the RB 966928 sugarcane starting at 90 days after transplanting (DAT). This effect increased with the time of intercropping, reaching at 180 DAT with a reduction of 57.3% in height,15.5% in stalk diameter, 90.4% in leaf areas, 86.6 and 75.2% in stalk and leaf dry mass, respectively. These reductions primarily due to the weed intertwining with the sugarcane plants because the weed had a physical choking and shading effect. This negative effect of morning glory on the sugarcane plants increased when they shared the substrate (i.e., when they competed for space and water), which also adversely affected weed growth, reducing 50.2% leaf areas and 42.1% shoot dry mass. The leaf area and the stalk and leaf dry mass of sugarcane are the characteristics more sensitive to the weed interference. Thus, both the shoot and root of M. cissoides interferes negatively in the growth of sugarcane, with the effect proportional to the period of coexistence, highlighting the detrimental effect on the stem (greater economic interest), and may also compromise the mechanical harvesting of the crop.

Highlights

  • Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a major crop cultivated in Brazil

  • The sugarcane cultivar RB 966928 was intercropped with morning glory (Merremia cissoides) using the following treatment strategies shown in Figure 1: (i) sugarcane monocropping, (ii) morning glory monocropping, (iii) sugarcane cropping intertwined with morning glory but in separate boxes, (iv) sugarcane cropping intertwined with morning glory in attached boxes and (v) sugarcane intercropping with morning glory in attached boxes with morning glory prevented from intertwining with the sugarcane

  • From 120 to 180 days after transplanting (DAT), sugarcane plants that grew intertwined with morning glory in attached boxes became 42.7 % smaller and with the stem 15.5% narrower than the control plants and the plants intercropped with morning glory in attached boxes with weed intertwining prevented

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The sugarcane cultivation area covers approximately 9.1 million ha intended for of sugarcane in Brazil, it is paramount that this crop be managed appropriately to increase or prevent a drop in production and/or yield. A serious issue in sugarcane cropping is the presence of weeds in cultivated areas (Martinelli et al 2011). Weeds compete intensely with crops for environmental resources, leading to a decrease in the number of stalks and a reduction in the yield and quality of the harvested product (technical characteristics) (Silva et al 2009), among other effects. Weeds may have other direct effects in addition to competition, including allelopathy and parasitism, and may have an indirect effect by acting as hosts for pests and diseases, thereby depreciating the harvested product or affecting the crop management practices (Pitelli 1985)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.