Abstract

Nitrogen (N) fertilization is a commonly applied silvicultural treatment in intensively managed coast Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. menziesii) plantations. Field trials were established in a randomized complete block design by Stimson Lumber Company (Gaston, Oregon), to test the economic viability of N fertilization on their ownership and to better understand Douglas-fir growth responses. The 23 stands comprising the trials were Douglas-fir dominated, had a total age of 16–24 years, had been precommercially thinned, and had a density of 386–1021 trees ha−1. Fertilizer was applied aerially at a rate of 224 kg N ha−1 as urea during the 2009–2010 dormant season. In the dormant season of 2016–2017, seven growing seasons following application, 40 trees were felled and measured with the objective of assessing crown attributes and aboveground allometrics. Branch-level foliage mass equations were developed from 267 subsampled branches and were applied to the 40 felled sample trees on which the basal diameter and height of all live branches were measured, allowing estimation of both the total amount of foliage and its vertical distribution. A right-truncated Weibull distribution was fitted to data, with the truncation point specified as the base of live tree crown. The resulting tree-level parameter estimates were modeled as functions of tree-level variables. Stand-level factors not explicitly measured were captured through the use of linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models with random stand effects. Fertilization resulted in more total crown foliage mass in the middle crown-third and caused a downward shift in the vertical distribution of foliage, with implications for feedback responses in crown development and photosynthetic capacity. Defining the morphological responses of Douglas-fir crowns to nitrogen fertilization provides a framework for studying influences on stand dynamics and should ultimately facilitate improved site-specific predictions of stem-volume growth.

Highlights

  • Net primary production (NPP) of forest stands can be estimated through quantification of ecophysiological processes, including mechanisms that influence the quantity and photosynthetic efficiency of foliage (e.g., [1])

  • This study aimed to augment the extensive, historical fertilization studies in the Pacific Northwest implemented by the Nutrition Project of the Stand Management Cooperative (SMC) and its predecessor, the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project (RFNRP), to further the understanding of fundamental physiological mechanisms driving growth response of intensively managed Douglas-fir plantations to nitrogen fertilization

  • The final model (Equation (9)) included a random stand effect on the first relative depth into crown (RDINC) term and was weighted using a power variance function of basal diameter (BD) to correct for heteroscedasticity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Net primary production (NPP) of forest stands can be estimated through quantification of ecophysiological processes, including mechanisms that influence the quantity and photosynthetic efficiency of foliage (e.g., [1]). If environmental variables relevant to fundamental ecophysiological processes can be measured, estimated, or forecast in a cost-effective manner for operational stands, prediction of tree growth under a range of alternative management activities and environmental conditions should be enhanced [4,5]. Under this scenario, any anthropogenic manipulation of resource availability (e.g., through thinning or fertilization) could be accounted for at a mechanistic level to predict growth responses, facilitating more accurate predictions where spatial or temporal variation in environmental conditions can be adequately characterized or predicted. Reliable quantification of foliage amount and its vertical distribution are key components in the hybrid modeling approach because they are driving factors for the amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation and are closely linked to growth distribution and changes in allometric relationships [6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call