Abstract
BackgroundPatients undergoing CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy exhibit multiple immune deficits that may increase their susceptibility to infections. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are life-threatening events in the setting of hematological diseases. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal role and duration of antifungal prophylaxis in this specific patient population. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of IFI prophylactic strategies over time and to assess IFI incidence rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma treated with CAR-T cell therapy. Study DesignSingle-center, retrospective study from a cohort of patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between April 2016 and March 2023. Group A (April 2016- August 2020) consisted of patients primarily treated with fluconazole, irrespective of their individual IFI risk profile. In Group B (September 2020- March 2023) antifungal prophylaxis was recommended only for high-risk patients. ResultsOverall, 330 patients were included. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed to 119/142 (84%) patients in Group A and 58/188 (31%) in Group B (p<0.001). Anti-mold azoles were prescribed to 8 (5.6%) patients in Group A and 21 (11.2%) patients in Group B. In Group A, 42 (29%) patients switched to another antifungal, 9 (21%) because of toxicity, with 6 cases of transaminitis and 3 cases of prolonged QTc. In Group B, 21 (11.2%) patients switched the antifungal drug, mainly from fluconazole or micafungin to a mold-active agent following revised guidelines. No difference was found in liver toxicity between the two groups at infusion, day 10, and day 30. No significant differences were observed between the groups. IFI following CAR T-cell therapy were rare, with one case of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in group A (0.7%) and one case of invasive aspergillosis in group B (0.5%), both occurring in patients on micafungin prophylaxis. ConclusionIn this large single-center cohort of patients with R/R lymphoma treated with CAR T-cells, we show that individualized prophylaxis, alongside careful management of CAR T-cell related toxicities like CRS, was associated with a very low IFI rate, avoiding the risk of unnecessary toxicities, drug-drug interactions, and high costs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.