Abstract

BackgroundTurtle shells tend to exhibit frequent and substantial variability, both in bone and scute layout. Aside from secondary changes, caused by diseases, parasites, and trauma, this variability appears to be inherent and result from stochastic or externally induced flaws of developmental programs. It is, thus, expected to be present in fossil turtle species at least as prominently, as in modern populations. Descriptions of variability and ontogeny are, however, rare for fossil turtles, mainly due to rarity, incompleteness, damage, and post-mortem deformation of their remains. This paper is an attempt at description and interpretation of external shell variability in representatives of the oldest true turtles, Proterochersis robusta and Proterochersis porebensis (Proterochersidae, the sister group to all other known testudinatans) from the Late Triassic (Norian) of Germany and Poland.MethodsAll the available shell remains of Proterochersis robusta (13 specimens) and Proterochersis porebensis (275 specimens) were studied morphologically in order to identify any ontogenetic changes, intraspecific variability, sexual dimorphism, and shell abnormalities. To test the inferred sexual dimorphism, shape analyses were performed for two regions (gular and anal) of the plastron.ResultsProterochersis spp. exhibits large shell variability, and at least some of the observed changes seem to be correlated with ontogeny (growth of gulars, extragulars, caudals, and marginals, disappearance of middorsal keel on the carapace). Several specimens show abnormal layout of scute sulci, several others unusual morphologies of vertebral scute areas, one has an additional pair of plastral scutes, and one extraordinarily pronounced, likely pathological, growth rings on the carapace. Both species are represented in a wide spectrum of sizes, from hatchlings to old, mature individuals. The largest fragmentary specimens of Proterochersis porebensis allow estimation of its maximal carapace length at approximately 80 cm, while Proterochersis robusta appears to have reached lower maximal sizes.DiscussionThis is the second contribution describing variability among numerous specimens of Triassic turtles, and the first to show evidence of unambiguous shell abnormalities. Presented data supplement the sparse knowledge of shell scute development in the earliest turtles and suggest that at least some aspects of the developmental programs governing scute development were already similar in the Late Triassic to these of modern forms.

Highlights

  • Expressions of atavistic morphologies were frequently cited as a cause of abnormal shell variants (Gadow, 1905; Newman, 1906b; Grant, 1936a, 1936b), but this always remained rather speculative (Coker, 1905, 1910; Cherepanov, 1989, 2006, 2014) and in most cases it is easy to refute by comparison with the shell composition of stem turtles (Gaffney, 1990; Li et al, 2008; Szczygielski & Sulej, 2016, 2018)

  • Shell remains of Proterochersis porebensis are much more numerous (270 cataloged specimens), but usually much more fragmentary, frequently consisting of parts of costals, small sections of plastron or the rim of the shell, or other uninformative elements, and only four relatively complete shells (ZPAL V.39/34, ZPAL V.39/48, ZPAL V.39/49, and ZPAL V.39/72) were found far (Figs. 4 and 5)

  • To Proterochersis robusta, the collected specimens of Proterochersis porebensis represent a wide spectrum of sizes and morphologies, probably representing various ontogenetic ages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The shell of turtles, relatively conserved structurally among taxa, tends to show considerable variation between individuals (Parker, 1901; Gadow, 1905; Newman, 1906a; Coker, 1910; Lynn, 1937; M1ynarski, 1956; Zangerl & Johnson, 1957; Zangerl, 1969; McEwan, 1982; Rothschild, Schultze & Pellegrini, 2013; Cherepanov, 2015, 2016; Farke & Distler, 2015; and many others). Abnormal morphologies are attained during postnatal life as a result of diseases, parasites, or trauma (Rothschild, Schultze & Pellegrini, 2013, and references therein) Shell variation affects both the bones and scutes of the plastron and carapace, and the frequency of changes within each of these domains varies between the species (Coker, 1910; Lynn, 1937; Zangerl & Johnson, 1957; Zangerl, 1969; McEwan, 1982) and may even differ between sexes within one species (Coker, 1910). Aside from secondary changes, caused by diseases, parasites, and trauma, this variability appears to be inherent and result from stochastic or externally induced flaws of developmental programs It is, expected to be present in fossil turtle species at least as prominently, as in modern populations. Presented data supplement the sparse knowledge of shell scute development in the earliest turtles and suggest that at least some aspects of the developmental programs governing scute development were already similar in the Late Triassic to these of modern forms

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call