Abstract

Analyses of shell shape variation in epifaunal and semi-infaunal myalinids from the LaSalle “cyclothem” attest to the extensive shape plasticity of some Late Pennsylvanian myalinids. Mean shell shapes differ significantly within and among species across three nearshore facies. Discriminant analyses of Fourier biometric data categorized by taxonomic, populational (habitat), life-mode, and “multi-species habitat assemblage”” discriminant groups reveal patterns of shape change and variation across an inferred environmental stress gradient in addition to taxonomic and life-mode shape differences. Fourier harmonic data are good indicators of shape differences between epifaunal and semi-infaunal life modes. Mean shapes of epifaunal species vary among habitats. Within-habitat shell shape convergence occurred between Myalina glossoidea and M. (Orthomyalina) slocomi. Interpopulational shape divergence occurred among all populations of M. (Orthomyalina) slocomi, M. glossoidea, and M. wyomingensis. Within-species variation among habitats produced significant mean shape differences among each of three “multi-species habitat assemblages.” Results indicate that a portion of the variation is of ecophenotypic origin.Mean interspecific shape differences reflect internal functional organization and life modes. Intraspecific shape differences among epifaunal species could reflect physical and biotic habitat variables. Several harmonic amplitudes vary in concert with inferred environmental variation among habitats. Although biologic interpretation of harmonic data is problematic, parallel trends in fifth harmonic amplitudes of epifaunal species mirror inferred differences in water turbulence among habitats and could reflect shape variation related to byssal attachment.Stress gradient trends in intraspecific shape variability cannot be collectively explained by either of the antithetical stability-diversity-variation hypotheses. Each species exhibits a different nonmonotonic trend. Maximal levels of intraspecific variation within each species occurred within different habitats. Within-species differences in levels of variation could result from genetic variation among populations as well as ecophenotypic influences. Comparative studies of ontogenetic shape change between valves of individuals, among individuals, and among populations are necessary to determine the relative influence of environmental variables on shape variation and evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call