Abstract
Bioenergy implications for Biodiversity and Ecosystems, GMO impact monitoring and a tool for the assessment of urban and industrial expansion impacts on riparian habitats are the topics of the present issue of BioRisk three topics from within the field of modern or contemporary land-use developments, representing typical drivers which put biodiversity and ecosystems at risk. When it comes to the question whether we can fuel the world with feedstock from bioenergy crops without losing the ability to feed a still growing world population of humans, an answer often ready at hand is to turn abandoned and marginal land to agricultural use. This either to increase crop yields in general or to cultivate dedicated energy crops on those lands in order to avoid land-use competition. Those concepts of cultivating or re-cultivating of seemingly surplus land are often based on optimistic assessments in the order of millions of hectares being available globally (German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina 2012; Offermann et al. 2011). The question whether those estimates of land potentials would bear up against calculations taking environmental and socio-economic constraints into account systematically was adopted in the opinion paper by Dauber et al. (2012; this issue). It is stated in this paper that confusion in the applicability of concepts suggesting the utilization of surplus land for bioenergy crop cultivation is caused by ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land as well by uncertainties in assessments of land availability and of potential yields of bioenergy crops when grown on surplus land. The authors suggest BioRisk 7: 1–4 (2012)
Highlights
Bioenergy implications for Biodiversity and Ecosystems, GMO impact monitoring and a tool for the assessment of urban and industrial expansion impacts on riparian habitats are the topics of the present issue of BioRisk - three topics from within the field of modern or contemporary land-use developments, representing typical drivers which put biodiversity and ecosystems at risk
As land-use change is regarded as one of the major drivers of the ongoing loss of biodiversity, there is a major concern that extensive commercial production of bioenergy feedstock could have negative effects on biodiversity
Positive effects, in particular of perennial crops, short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations and agroforestry systems, on biodiversity at local scales are reported. As many of those findings are based on studies from experimental sites, significant uncertainties still exist about impacts of full commercial production at the landscape or regional scales (Dauber et al 2010)
Summary
Bioenergy implications for Biodiversity and Ecosystems, GMO impact monitoring and a tool for the assessment of urban and industrial expansion impacts on riparian habitats are the topics of the present issue of BioRisk - three topics from within the field of modern or contemporary land-use developments, representing typical drivers which put biodiversity and ecosystems at risk. Policy recommendations for resolving conflicting landuse demands suggested by Dauber et al (2012) comprise first of all a slow-down in the rapid expansion of the bioenergy sector, at least until adequate and effective controls addressing environmental and social impacts such as biodiversity loss, GHG emissions and displacement of local communities are implemented in bioenergy policies. To date policies on bioenergy development have not given adequate attention to the potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (Groom et al 2008).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
