Shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic primers in wet conditions.

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine whether a hydrophilic primer (Transbond MIP, [MIP]) produces a significant difference in shear/peel bond strength compared with a traditional hydrophobic primer (Transbond XT, [XT]) in wet (W) or dry (D) conditions and if there is a difference in the site of bond failure. A randomized blinded in vitro design. The University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Dentistry. Forty extracted human premolars were divided into four test groups (n = 10 each): MIP-dry conditions (MIPD), MIP-wet conditions (MIPW), XT-dry (XTD) and XT-wet (XTW). Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the teeth according to the manufacturer's directions except XTW and MIPW were exposed to moisture. Shear/peel test 24 h after bonding using an Instron at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and the adhesive remnant index to determine the site of bond failure. The bond strengths (X +/- SD) in MPa were XTD = 8.3 +/- 2.3; XTW = 0.8 +/- 0.7; MIPD = 7.5 +/- 1.8 and MIPW = 7.9 +/- 1.7. The shear/peel bond strengths were significantly different: XTD = MIPD = MIPW > XTW (p < or = 0.01; two-way ANOVA; Tukey HSD). The ARI scores were also significantly different: XTD = MIPD = MIPW > XTW (p < or = 0.01; Chi-square). Orthodontists who suspect moisture contamination should use a hydrophilic primer during bonding procedures to maintain shear/peel bond strength.