Shear, Strain, and Richardson Number Variations in the Thermocline. Part II: Modeling Mixing

Abstract

Abstract Gregg has provided observational evidence that averaged estimates of dissipation, ϵ, vary approximately as the square of the internal wave field energy level ϵ ∼ E2. He notes that the finding is consistent with a specific model for energy transfer in the internal wave field proposed by Henyey et al. If it is also consistent with a purely statistical breaking model, based on the random superposition of independent waves, support for any particular dynamic scenario vanishes. However, most previous statistical models of the wave breaking process have demonstrated an extreme sensitivity of dissipation to energy level. Doubling E results in an increase of dissipation by a factor of 2 × 105 in the early model of Garrett and Munk and by 103 in the later model of Desaubies and Smith. These mixing models are revisited, attempting to reconcile their predictions with the observations of Gregg. An extensive Doppler sonar (5.5-m vertical resolution) and CTD (5400 profiles to 420 m) dataset, obtained from the ...