Shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the shear bond strengths of six different porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) materials cemented to enamel with two different MDP-containing resin cements. Materials and methods: Totally 120 disc specimens were fabricated with In-Ceram alumina (ICA), Turkom-CeraTM (TCR), IPS Empress (IPS), IPS Empress-II (IPS2), Finesse (FNS), and Ceramco-3 (CER) ceramic systems (n = 20). Sixty specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (Clearfil SA), and 60 specimens were cemented with self-etch resin cement (Panavia F2.0) to enamel. Thus, 120 PLV–enamel specimens were assigned to 12 experimental groups (ICA/Pv, ICA/Cf, TCR/Pv, TCR/Cf, IPS/Pv, IPS/Cf, IPS2/Pv, IPS2/Cf, CER/Pv, CER/Cf). Shear force was applied on PLV–enamel interfaces until failure. Obtained data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and t-tests. Results: Obtained shear bond strength values (SBSV) ranged as follows, respectively; TCR/Cf (7.70 MPa), FNS/Cf (7.57 MPa), TCR/Pv (6.91 MPa), ICA/Pv (5.05 MPa), CER/Pv (4.75 MPa), IPS2/Cf (4.66 MPa), FNS/Pv (4.43 MPa), IPS2/Pv (3.97 MPa), CER/Cf (3.82 MPa), IPS/Pv (3.62 MPa), ICA/Cf (3.59 MPa), IPS/Cf (3.11 MPa). Highest SBSV were obtained in TCR groups (7.70 MPa for TCR/Cf and 6.91 MPa for TCR/Pv) and lowest SBSV were obtained in IPS groups (3.11 MPa for IPS/Cf and 3.62 MPa for IPS/Pv) in both resin cements. No significant bond strength difference was found between two resin cements. Conclusions: TCR groups showed highest SBSV; lowest SBSV were obtained with both IPS PLVs. The resin cement type did not significantly affect the bond strength value of a ceramic type, except for the Finesse system.