Abstract

We show that sharing a quantum reference frame requires sharing measurement operators that identify the reference frame in addition to operators that measure its state. Observers restricted to finite resources cannot, in general, operationally determine that they share such operators. Uncertainty about whether system-identification operators are shared induces decoherence.

Highlights

  • Bartlett, Rudolph and Spekkens [1] define nonfungible quantum information as information that Alice and Bob can share only by exchanging a quantum system

  • This is in contradistinction to fungible information that Alice can communicate to Bob by sending a string of classical bits, e.g., a bit string that describes a system or encodes a measurement outcome

  • We show that the physical implementations of these observables encode nonfungible information

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rudolph and Spekkens [1] define nonfungible quantum information as information that Alice and Bob can share only by exchanging a quantum (i.e., physical) system This is in contradistinction to fungible information that Alice can communicate to Bob by sending a string of classical bits, e.g., a bit string that describes a system or encodes a measurement outcome. Pointer state outcomes specifying the relative states of QRFs, which as shown in [1] can be inferred without physically sharing the QRFs, are defined only with respect to such nonfungible, measurement-operator encoded information. The nonfungible information encoded by the physical implementations of QRF-identifying observables must already be shared either to exchange a QRF or to infer the relative states of non-shared QRFs. Whether Alice and Bob implement the same observables cannot be determined operationally with finite resources, either by Alice and Bob or by a third party. We suggest that the shared “classical reality” of the laboratory emphasized by Bohr [5] can be attributed to this unavoidable uncertainty about shared observables

System Identification Formalism
Fungible Information Is Insufficient for System Identification
Implemented System Identification Operators Are Nonfungible
Uncertainty about Operator Sharing Induces Decoherence
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.