Abstract

This paper attempted to tackle tow issues: the first issue is the income distribution top income quintiles (including some parcels) with bottom 20% and 40% ones. Secondly whether economic growth alone, could reduce extreme poverty and mitigate income inequality in Sudan? Different prosperity shared indicators applied to data obtained from two Labor Force Migration households’ Surveys collected by Ministry of Manpower for years 1996 and 2011. The findings of this study indicated that the income share of bottom 40% failed to catch up with shares of top 10%.and overall per capita .Accordingly, all the shared prosperity indicators results were associated with idea of polarization in the Sudan society, and more importantly CAGR (as one of indicators) empathized that the bottom 20% income have to grow by more than 60% annually in order to catch up with overall per capita growth during the period of the study. To improve the picture of the income distribution and to reverse the situation of poverty in Sudan, the pattern of economic growth has to be restructured and to be associated with high economic participation. The paper recommended a deliberate government intervention to improve income distribution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.