Abstract

Previous human fMRI studies have reported activation of somatosensory areas not only during actual touch, but also during touch observation. However, it has remained unclear how the brain encodes visually evoked tactile intensities. Using an associative learning method, we investigated neural representations of roughness intensities evoked by (a) tactile explorations and (b) visual observation of tactile explorations. Moreover, we explored (c) modality-independent neural representations of roughness intensities using a cross-modal classification method. Case (a) showed significant decoding performance in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), while in the case (b), the bilateral posterior parietal cortices, the inferior occipital gyrus, and the primary motor cortex were identified. Case (c) observed shared neural activity patterns in the bilateral insula, the SMG, and the ACC. Interestingly, the insular cortices were identified only from the cross-modal classification, suggesting their potential role in modality-independent tactile processing. We further examined correlations of confusion patterns between behavioral and neural similarity matrices for each region. Significant correlations were found solely in the SMG, reflecting a close relationship between neural activities of SMG and roughness intensity perception. The present findings may deepen our understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying intensity perception of tactile roughness.

Highlights

  • Visual assessment of a surface texture prior to touching is crucial when interacting with objects[1]

  • We investigated neural representations of perceived roughness intensities evoked by tactile explorations and visual observations

  • We performed three searchlight multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) (a) on the data evoked by tactile explorations, (b) on the data evoked by visual observations, and (c) on the data evoked by both types of stimuli using the cross-modal classification method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual assessment of a surface texture prior to touching is crucial when interacting with objects[1]. Using two intensities may reveal neural activity for discriminating different tactile intensities, but not for encoding the intensity None of these studies explicitly investigated neural representations of visually evoked tactile intensities: The former primarily focused on neural responses associated with pleasant caressing speeds[15] and the latter primarily compared neural responses during observed touch of self and others[16]. According to these previous observations, it is plausible that somatosensory cortices can represent multiple levels of perceived tactile intensities elicited visually. Comparing confusion patterns between neural and behavioral responses can help to find neural correlates of perceived roughness intensities

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call