Abstract

BackgroundAcquisition of bipedality is a hallmark of human evolution. How bipedality evolved from great ape-like locomotor behaviors, however, is still highly debated. This is mainly because it is difficult to infer locomotor function, and even more so locomotor kinematics, from fossil hominin long bones. Structure-function relationships are complex, as long bone morphology reflects phyletic history, developmental programs, and loading history during an individual’s lifetime. Here we discriminate between these factors by investigating the morphology of long bones in fetal and neonate great apes and humans, before the onset of locomotion.Methodology/Principal FindingsComparative morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphysis indicates that its morphology reflects phyletic relationships between hominoid taxa to a greater extent than taxon-specific locomotor adaptations. Diaphyseal morphology in humans and chimpanzees exhibits several shared-derived features, despite substantial differences in locomotor adaptations. Orangutan and gorilla morphologies are largely similar, and likely represent the primitive hominoid state.Conclusions/SignificanceThese findings are compatible with two possible evolutionary scenarios. Diaphyseal morphology may reflect retained adaptive traits of ancestral taxa, hence human-chimpanzee shared-derived features may be indicative of the locomotor behavior of our last common ancestor. Alternatively, diaphyseal morphology might reflect evolution by genetic drift (neutral evolution) rather than selection, and might thus be more informative about phyletic relationships between taxa than about locomotor adaptations. Both scenarios are consistent with the hypothesis that knuckle-walking in chimpanzees and gorillas resulted from convergent evolution, and that the evolution of human bipedality is unrelated to extant great ape locomotor specializations.

Highlights

  • Humans and extant great apes exhibit a pattern of locomotor diversification [1,2,3,4], which stands in contrast with their phyletic relationships

  • Diaphyseal morphology may reflect retained adaptive traits of ancestral taxa, human-chimpanzee shared-derived features may be indicative of the locomotor behavior of our last common ancestor

  • Graphing the first two shape components (SC1 and SC2), which account for 23.9% and 15.1% of the total shape variation in the sample indicates that diaphyseal surface morphologies of gorillas (G) and orangutans (O) are more similar to each other than to any other taxon, while diaphyseal morphologies of chimpanzees (C) and humans (H) are approximately distant from GO morphologies (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans and extant great apes exhibit a pattern of locomotor diversification [1,2,3,4], which stands in contrast with their phyletic relationships. Diaphyseal morphology may reflect retained adaptive traits of ancestral taxa, human-chimpanzee shared-derived features may be indicative of the locomotor behavior of our last common ancestor. Both scenarios are consistent with the hypothesis that knuckle-walking in chimpanzees and gorillas resulted from convergent evolution, and that the evolution of human bipedality is unrelated to extant great ape locomotor specializations.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call