Abstract

Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which clinicians and patients make treatment decisions together. Although it is considered essential to patient-centred care, the adoption of shared decision-making into routine clinical practice has been slow, and there is a need to increase implementation. This paper describes the development and delivery of a training intervention to promote shared decision-making in medication management in mental health as part of the Shared Involvement in Medication Management Education (ShIMME) project. Three stakeholder groups (service users, care coordinators and psychiatrists) received training in shared decision-making, and their feedback was evaluated. The programme was mostly well received, with all groups rating interaction with peers as the best aspect of the training. This small-scale pilot shows that it is feasible to deliver training in shared decision-making to several key stakeholders. Larger studies will be required to assess the effectiveness of such training.

Highlights

  • Declaration of interest All authors were involved in the management of the Shared Involvement in Medication Management Education (ShIMME) project

  • Declaration of interest All authors were involved in the management of the ShIMME project

  • S.R. was the principal investigator and project manager; N.M. was employed by the project as the qualitative research advisor; and U.S co-led service user groups in Cambridge and is employed by Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust

Read more

Summary

Methods

The initial phase of the project involved a literature review and consultation with local stakeholders about the process of shared decision-making. Data were collected via focus groups with practitioners and users of adult mental health services in CPFT. Four focus groups were conducted with service users (n = 27), two with psychiatrists (n = 4), one with community psychiatric nurses (CPNs, n = 10), and one with care coordinators other than CPNs (n = 8). Consultation groups lasted around 90 min and were audio recorded. The anonymised transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis,[37] conducted with NVivo software This involved a detailed exploration of transcript texts by two team members who worked in collaboration to iteratively develop themes

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call