Abstract
Abstract Many countries are proposing major public infrastructure investment, addressing the net zero imperative and need to recover from the pandemic. Yet the investments will deliver on these policy goals only if appraisals take account of strategic complementarities in determining the future path of the economy, including technological choices. Cost–benefit analysis as currently applied is unable to do this, even when incorporating wider economic benefits. Furthermore, in purporting to be a technical tool, it fails to acknowledge the inevitable political judgements and distributional consequences involved in selecting projects. There is a need for an approach to appraisal that identifies when major projects have transformational potential, and an approach to policy that ensures complementary investments occur, by tackling coordination failures either among different policy actors or between private- and public-sector activities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
