Abstract

Poor relief practices in rural Tippecanoe County first involved boarding the sick‐poor in the community and later broadened to include institutional care. Local officials implemented these changes not to achieve social control of an increasing and more diverse population but, at first, to consolidate the costs of caring for the chronically ill. Although the farm was not cost effective, it continued and expanded to include some acutely ill. County officials' pragmatic attention to local conditions, personal needs, and attitudes toward poverty and health informed their actions, shaping the county's relief program—a program that served only a minority of the sick‐poor.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.