Abstract
ABSTRACTIn this paper, I argue for a way to evaluate beliefs grounded in the testimony of sham epistemic authorities and then apply that principle to beliefs tokened as a consequence of implicit biases. As a result, such implicitly biased beliefs are correctly evaluated as praiseworthy by their possessors, even though the belief is epistemically defective.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
