Shaly sand rock physics analysis and seismic inversion implication

Abstract

The analysis of well data from the Enfield field of the Exmouth Sub-basin, WA, indicates that both cementation and pore-filling clay appear to have a stiffening effect on the reservoir sands. The elastic contrast between brine sand and the overlying shale is often small and the large amplitudes observed from seismic data are associated with hydrocarbon content. More detailed rock physics and depth trend analysis of elastic and petrophysical properties, however, indicate significant spatial variability in the cap rock shales across the field with different sand shale mixtures, causing changes in the elastic response of the rock. Areas where shales are softer produce weak seismic amplitude contrasts even with high hydrocarbon saturation; the amplitude response being similar to areas with stiffer shales and brine-filled sands. The variations in reservoir quality are, therefore, masked by the distribution of the brine, oil and gas, as well as the variations in the cap rock. The Enfield rock physics analysis provides an example of reducing amplitude ambiguity over lithology-fluid variation and improves the chance of successful interpretation of the results of seismic inversion.