Abstract
The premise of Patrick Gray’s Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic is that Shakespeare explores questions of self-determination that have preoccupied Western philosophers since antiquity. Gray understands Shakespeare’s classical heroes as existing in a pagan world that rejects (Christian) traits like vulnerability, compromise, and collaboration. These characters perform an ideal self that mimics pagan divinity as omnipotent and untouchable by exerting absolute authority over politics (Julius Caesar), the self (Brutus), or their social world (Antony and Cleopatra). Shakespeare’s Roman plays demonstrate at once the appeal of this inviolable self, especially in the wake of early modern England’s crises of aristocracy, and its ultimate undesirability from the early modern Christian perspective. For Gray, Shakespeare offers an alternative understanding that anticipates that of Hegel: a self “embedded” (9) in a “multilateral and reciprocal” web of social relations (39), neither a world within him/herself (as posited by Descartes and Kant) or...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.