Abstract
Recording body weight (BW) regularly is a useful tool for cattle management. However, weighing scales (WS) are not always available on farms, hence the need for BW estimating formulas, which are frequently breed- and/or age-specific. Thus, the current study evaluated the reliability of Shaeffer’s formula (SF), BW=[body length x (thoracic perimeter)2]/300), in nine slick (SLICK) and nine wild type-haired (WT) Holstein calves/heifers. The SF results were compared with those obtained using a WS by the REG and GLIMMIX Procedures (SAS). During weeks 1 to 8, there was a strong association between both weighing methods used on SLICK (R2=0.88; P<0.0001) and WT (R2=0.85; P<0.0001) calves. On average, during this period the SF overestimated BW by 6.39 kg, when compared with the WS (P<0.0001). From 3 to 33 months of age, a strong association was also observed between both weighing methods in the SLICK (R2=0.97; P<0.0001) and WT (R2=0.97; P<0.0001) heifers. Sampling and weighing method interacted (P<0.0001) due to the divergence of the SF and WS curves between 8 and 33 months of age, ranging from 23.20 (P=0.0435) to 80.41 kg (P<0.0001) greater BW by the SF. Shaeffer’s formula turned out to be a feasible and reliable method for BW estimation in the SLICK and WT calves/heifers evaluated in this study, that can be further improved by subtracting the average of overestimated values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.