Abstract
Objectives: The identification and classification of carbapenemases are meaningful in clinical treatment, epidemiology, and multidrug-resistant bacteria control. We sought to identify the proportion of carbapenemase-producing and carbapenemase classifications in gram-negative bacilli in our hospital. Methods: Isolates of gram-negative bacilli were extracted from sputum, blood, and urine samples in a medical center in Ho Chi Minh City. The identification of gram-negative bacilli was performed using the Phoenix M50 automated system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). An antibiogram was conducted using the disk-diffusion method to detect meropenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Carbapenemase confirmation and classification of isolates resistant or intermediately resistant to meropenem were performed using the NMIC500 CPO kit on the Phoenix M50 system. Results: Among 599 isolates of gram-negative bacilli, 108 isolates were resistant or intermediately resistant to carbapenem (meropenem). Of these108 isolates, 107 (99.1%) were resistant due to the carbapenemase-producing mechanism. The proportions of resistant or intermediately resistant isolates to carbapenem were as follows: 73.8% for Acinetobacter baumannii, 26.4% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 25.9% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 2.8% for Escherichia coli. Class D carbapenemase accounted for the highest proportion, with 53 (49.5%) of 107 isolates, followed by class B with 31 isolates (29%), and class A with the lowest proportion of 2 isolates (1.9%). Also, 44.4% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and 74.4% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates produced class D carbapenemase. Conclusions: Gram-negative bacilli are resistant to carbapenem primarily due to the carbapenemase-secreting mechanism. D-class carbapenemase accounted for the highest percentage, followed by B-class type, and A-class carbapenemase in gram-negative bacilli.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have