Sexuality in German urogynecological patients and healthy controls: is there a difference with respect to the diagnosis?

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate sexual function among German urogynecological patients compared to a control group without urogynecological symptoms, using the validated German version of the Australian pelvic floor questionnaire. Study designRetrospective study including 313 women divided into five subgroups: women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB), mixed incontinence (MI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and healthy controls. The self-administered questionnaire is divided into three domains: bladder, pelvic organ prolapse, and sexual function. It also includes severity, bothersomeness and condition-specific quality of life. Only completely filled out questionnaires were included. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used as a non-parametric test to calculate significances for ordinal data. A p-value <.05 was taken as significant. Results16/59 (27.1%) women in the control group were not sexually active compared to 19/60 (31.7%) in the SUI group, 51/98 (52.0%) in the mixed-incontinence group, 19/43 (44.2%) in the OAB group, and 24/53 (45.3%) in the prolapse group. Coital incontinence was present significantly more often in women with SUI (15/41, 36.6%) or mixed incontinence (20/44, 45.5%) than among the controls (1/49, 2.1%). Hence, concerning sexuality, women with urogynecological symptoms were all significantly more affected than the healthy controls. ConclusionThe German version of the Australian pelvic floor questionnaire is a feasible tool to evaluate not only symptoms of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse but also sexual dysfunction. A substantial proportion of our urogynecological patients suffer immensely from problems with their sexuality, and it is therefore our responsibility as physicians to provide assistance and improve our education in this field.