Sexual motivation—an inquiry into events determining the occurrence of sexual behavior

Abstract

For the individual engaged in it, sexual behavior has no finality or purpose other than its own execution. Data are presented showing that the execution of sexual reflexes can promote learning, i.e. it functions as reinforcement. Furthermore, positive affect is generated. Based on these principles, a model of sexual motivation has been elaborated. The conceptual framework is the incentive motivation theory previously proposed by Bindra D, A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification, Psychol Rev 1974: 81:199–213; A Theory of Intelligent Behavior, New York: Wiley, 1976; How adaptive behavior is produced: a perceptual-motivational alternative to response reinforcement, Behav Brain Sci 1978; 1: 41–52. Although the model is intended for application to most mammals, the rat is used as example. Essentially, sexual approach behaviors are activated by appropriate incentives (conditioned in the male, unconditioned in the female). Approach is, in the inexperienced male, followed by the execution of copulatory reflexes as a consequence of accidentally obtained tactile stimulation of the perineal region. In the female, copulatory acts are activated by tactile stimulation of the flanks and hinds provided by the mounting male. The role of conditioning for the execution of copulatory reflexes and for the acquisition of incentive value of neutral stimuli is analyzed. It is also shown that the incentive properties of sexual acts are not substantially different from those of other incentives. Sexual exhaustion is suggested to be either a case of negative alliesthesia or of stimulus habituation and the Coolidge effect is, in consequence, an example of dishabituation. Studies in women and men support this proposal. It is emphasized that sexual behavior is best understood as being entirely mechanistic albeit not deterministic.