Abstract

The synaptonemal complex (SC) surface-spreading technique was used to visualize the process of chromosome synapsis in spermatocytes and oocytes of E. talpinus Pallas, 1770, a species with the XX sex chromosome system in both males and females. We used electron microscopy and immunofluorescent localization of synaptonemal complex protein (SCP3) and centromeric proteins to analyze the structure and behaviour of synaptonemal complexes in prophase I of meiosis, aiming to reveal signs of meiotic sexual dimorphism in this species. We present evidence of considerable differences in the structure and behaviour of the axial structures of sex bivalents in male and female meiosis, despite the isomorphic G- and C-banding patterns of mitotic sex chromosomes. During meiotic prophase I, the sex bivalent in females behaved as autosomal bivalents, but it was not involved in the formation of the bouquet configuration or it was the first to leave it. The XX chromosomes of males formed closed sex bivalents. Only short tracts of SC were formed at both ends of the sex bivalent, while large middle segments of the lateral elements remained unpaired. The male sex chromosomes also formed characteristic “sex bodies”. In fact, electron microscopy revealed dense nucleolus-like bodies associated with unpaired parts of the axial elements. These regions of the sex chromosomes were poorly immunostained, because the distribution of SCP3 had a peculiar powder-like pattern, but SCP3 was not associated with the nucleolus-like bodies. We also revealed signs of sexual dimorphism in the dynamics of formation and destruction of autosomal SCs. In males, the total SC length was shorter than in females. The chromosome bouquet configuration was preserved up to the stage of early pachytene in females. The bouquet configuration in males was not expressed. At late pachytene, gaps were revealed in the structure of autosomal SCs in spermatocytes immunostained with antibodies to SCP3. The pattern of distribution of these gaps was comparable with the G-banding patterns of mitotic chromosomes.

Highlights

  • The key point for evolution and gametes by meiotic division

  • Sexual dimorphism implies that the processes of recombination, chromosome pairing, synapsis, and desynapsis of homologous chromosomes are subjected to different levels of checkpoint control in males and females (Morelli, Cohen, 2005)

  • The present study revealed a number of differences in the structure and behaviour of autosomes in oocytes and spermatocytes of E. talpinus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Considerably extended in recent years due to active interest in the problems of regulation in meiosis and the mechanisms of selection of meiotic cells, which are different in females and males (Forejt, 1984; Tease, Hultén, 2004; Morelli, Cohen, 2005). Sexual dimorphism implies that the processes of recombination, chromosome pairing, synapsis, and desynapsis of homologous chromosomes are subjected to different levels of checkpoint control in males and females (Morelli, Cohen, 2005). Sexual dimorphism represents one of the fundamental evolutionary challenges (Williams, Carroll, 2009) In mammals, it is determined by sex chromosome systems, commonly XX/XY. There are at least four types of deviations (Veyrunes et al, 2010): (1) typical XY males and different females with XX and XY in Myopus schisticolor Lilljeborg, 1844, Dicrostonyx torquatus Pallas, 1778, Akodon sp. (Fredga, 1983, 1994; Hoekstra, Edwards 2000; Ortiz et al, 2009); (2) typical XY males and deviant XO females (single X) in Microtus oregoni Bachman, 1839 (Ohno et al, 1966; Fredga, 1983); (3) females and males with XO karyotypes in Tokudaia osimensis Abe, 1933, T. tokunoshimensis Endo et Tsuchiya, 2006 (Arakawa et al, 2002) and Ellobius lutescens Thomas, 1897 (Matthey 1953; Just et al, 1995); (4) males and females with identical isomorphic XX in three sibling species of Ellobius, E. tancrei Blasius, 1884, E. talpinus Pallas, 1770 and E. alaicus Vorontsov et al, 1969 (Vorontsov et al, 1980; Bakloushinskaya, Lyapunova, 1990; Just et al, 2007; Romanenko et al, 2007)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.