Sexual differences in habitat use by small mammals: evolutionary strategy or reproductive constraint?

Abstract

This study examines the hypothesis that intersexual differences in habitat use by small mammals is an adaptive strategy. Specifically, I evaluate the occurrence of sexual differences in habitat by Peromyscus and Microtus, and test possible adaptive mechanisms which may lead to such differences.White-footed mice and meadow voles were live-trapped and microhabitat quantified in four habitats. Sexual differences in microhabitat use were found in three of 12 comparisons. These differences may be related to density dependent resource subdivision and habitat heterogencity, but neither of these can account completely for the observed patterns. Sexual differences in habitat do not appear to be an evolutionary strategy maximizing reproductive effort by females, or reducing predation. These sexual differences may reduce intraspecific resource overlap, or may simply reflect reproductive constraints limiting female habitat use to suitable nesting areas.