Abstract

Responses to sexually antagonistic selection are thought to be constrained by the shared genetic architecture of homologous male and female traits. Accordingly, adaptive sexual dimorphism depends on mechanisms such as genotype‐by‐sex interaction (G×S) and sex‐specific plasticity to alleviate this constraint. We tested these mechanisms in a population of Xiphophorus birchmanni (sheepshead swordtail), where the intensity of male competition is expected to mediate intersexual conflict over age and size at maturity. Combining quantitative genetics with density manipulations and analysis of sex ratio variation, we confirm that maturation traits are dimorphic and heritable, but also subject to large G×S. Although cross‐sex genetic correlations are close to zero, suggesting sex‐linked genes with important effects on growth and maturation are likely segregating in this population, we found less evidence of sex‐specific adaptive plasticity. At high density, there was a weak trend towards later and smaller maturation in both sexes. Effects of sex ratio were stronger and putatively adaptive in males but not in females. Males delay maturation in the presence of mature rivals, resulting in larger adult size with subsequent benefit to competitive ability. However, females also delay maturation in male‐biased groups, incurring a loss of reproductive lifespan without apparent benefit. Thus, in highly competitive environments, female fitness may be limited by the lack of sex‐specific plasticity. More generally, assuming that selection does act antagonistically on male and female maturation traits in the wild, our results demonstrate that genetic architecture of homologous traits can ease a major constraint on the evolution of adaptive dimorphism.

Highlights

  • Sexual dimorphism arises because fitness is limited by different traits in females and males (Bateman, 1948)

  • The two measures of size at maturity are strongly correlated in both sexes regressions of weight at maturity (WTM) on AM yield very similar patterns

  • Perhaps unsurprisingly given the lack of main effects, we found no significant interactions between density and sex ratio on either male or female life history to support the second of these predictions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sexual dimorphism arises because fitness is limited by different traits in females and males (Bateman, 1948). An important consequence of this is that homologous traits in males and females can have very different sex-specific optima (i.e. sexually antagonistic selection). In some cases sexual antagonism can be fully resolved over evolutionary time by the evolution of sex-limited traits. Where this is not the case the degree of sex-specific adaptation depends on constraints arising from genetic architecture that is shared between the sexes (Poissant et al, 2010, Lande, 1980, Fairbairn & Roff, 2006). We ask whether sex differences in plastic responses to changing levels of conspecific competition offer an alternative route to sex-specific adaptive phenotypic expression

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.