Abstract

Gender roles are anti-dichotomous and malleable social constructs that should theoretically be constructed independently from biological sex. However, it is unclear whether and how the factor of sex is related to neural mechanisms involved in social constructions of gender roles. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate sex specificity in gender role constructions and the corresponding underlying neural mechanisms. We measured gender role orientation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, used a voxel-based global brain connectivity method based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the within-network connectivity in the brain reward network, and analyzed how the integration of the reward network is related to gender role scores between sex groups. An omnibus analysis of voxel-wise global brain connectivity values within a two-level linear mixed model revealed that in female participants, femininity scores were positively associated with integration in the posterior orbitofrontal cortex and subcallosal cortex, whereas masculinity scores were positively associated with integration in the frontal pole. By contrast, in male participants, masculinity was negatively correlated with integration in the nucleus accumbens and subcallosal cortex. For the first time, the present study revealed the sex-specific neural mechanisms underlying distinct gender roles, which elucidates the process of gender construction from the perspective of the interaction between reward sensitivity and social reinforcement.

Highlights

  • Gender roles are malleable and socially constructed phenomena (Keener and Mehta, 2017)

  • After characterizing the within-network connectivity (WNC) of the reward network (RN), we examined whether and how the integration of the RN was related to gender role scores between sex groups by conducting an omnibus analysis of voxel-wise WNC values in the RN within the two-level linear mixed model (LMM)

  • The current study revealed that sexspecific neural mechanisms exist in the RN underlying distinct gender role constructs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gender roles are malleable and socially constructed phenomena (Keener and Mehta, 2017). Results have been inconsistent regarding whether gender constructs have changed as society has changed (Auster and Ohm, 2000; Prentice and Carranza, 2002; Seem and Clark, 2006; Dean and Tate, 2017). Whereas the results of some studies suggest that the desirability of particular traits for males and females may be changing along with other changes in society (Dean and Tate, 2017), the results of other studies seem to reflect the persistence of traditional gender role expectations for men and women (Auster and Ohm, 2000; Prentice and Carranza, 2002; Seem and Clark, 2006). Investigating the neurobiological underpinnings of gender types beyond the common gender dichotomization is informative but may not reveal the sexspecific social construction of gender characteristics and the corresponding neural mechanisms; the current study aimed to explore the sex-specific neural signatures underlying gender constructions

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.