Abstract

Sex estimation is considered one of the first steps in the forensic identification process. Morphological and morphometrical differences between males and females have been used as means for morphoscopic and metric methods on both cranial and postcranial skeletal elements. When dry skeletal elements are not available, virtual data can be used as a substitute. The present research explores 3-dimensional (3D) scans from a Turkish population to test a sex estimation method developed by Purkait (2005). Overall, 296 individuals were used in this study (158 males and 138 females). Purkait’s triangle parameters were measured on computed tomography (CT) scans obtained from both right and left femora of each patient at the Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training Research Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey). Intra- and inter-observer errors were assessed for all variables through technical error of measurements analysis. Bilateral asymmetry and sex differences were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches. Univariate and multivariate discriminant function analyses were then conducted. Observer errors demonstrated an overall agreement within and between experts, as indicated by technical error of measurement (TEM) results. No bilateral asymmetries were reported, and all parameters demonstrated a statistically significant difference between males and females. Fourteen discriminant models were generated by applying single and combined parameters, producing a total correct sex classification ranging from 78.4% to 92.6%. In addition, over 67% of the total sample was accurately classified, with 95% or greater posterior probabilities. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of 3D sex estimation using Purkait’s triangle on a Turkish population, with accuracy rates comparable to those reported in other populations. This is the first attempt to apply this method on virtual data and although further validation and standardisation are recommended for its application on dry bone, this research constitutes a significant contribution to the development of population-specific standards when only virtual data are available. Key points CT analysis using Purkait’s triangle is a suitable tool for assessment of sex in unidentified individuals. The best overall estimation rate was achieved with the F11 model, with around 92% of accuracy. The results suggested 78.4% to 92.6% correct sex identification rates. More research is needed to expand the sample set and verify the results.

Highlights

  • The forensic identification process requires relevant information to be gathered from skeletal remains to construct the biological profile of an unknown individual in a medicolegal context [1]

  • Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans of 322 individuals who were admitted to the hospital with pelvic diseases were assessed

  • The variance of error reported within the same observer indicates high reliability of the parameters, with rTEM under the 5% level of acceptance and R indicating 1%–8% of error attributed to measurement error

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The forensic identification process requires relevant information to be gathered from skeletal remains to construct the biological profile of an unknown individual in a medicolegal context [1]. The recording of biological markers supports the categorisation of the unidentified subject into specific groups that account for basic information such as sex, age-at-death, ancestry, and stature. Positive identification of a specific individual entails a process consisting of comparing specific anatomical features with antemortem records with a thorough evaluation of the observations and evidence obtained by the expert [2]. The forensic anthropologist works with skeletonised or partially skeletonised remains to generate a biological profile aiming to assist with positive identification of the unknown individual. One of the first steps in the identification routine is sex estimation. Correct sex estimation excludes about half of the general population, making it an imperative

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call