Abstract
Mark Freeman's reflective explorations into an “ethics of attention” prompt a number of issues and questions raised in this response. These include the historical, particular, situated, and contingent character of ethics and transcendence; Freeman's skepticism; moral criteria for judging varieties of transcendence; the demarcation of ethics; and the kinds of subjectivity compatible with an ethics of attention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have