Abstract

When predicting the arrival time of an approaching sound source, listeners typically exhibit an anticipatory bias that affords a margin of safety in dealing with looming objects. The looming bias has been demonstrated behaviorally in the laboratory and in the field (Neuhoff 1998, 2001), neurally in fMRI studies (Seifritz et al., 2002), and comparatively in non-human primates (Ghazanfar, Neuhoff, and Logothetis, 2002). In the current work, male and female listeners were presented with three-dimensional looming sound sources and asked to press a button when the source was at the point of closest approach. Females exhibited a significantly greater anticipatory bias than males. Next, listeners were presented with sounds that either approached or receded and then stopped at three different terminal distances. Consistent with the time-to-arrival judgments, female terminal distance judgments for looming sources were significantly closer than male judgments. However, there was no difference between male and female terminal distance judgments for receding sounds. Taken together with the converging behavioral, neural, and comparative evidence, the current results illustrate the environmental salience of looming sounds and suggest that the anticipatory bias for auditory looming may have been shaped by evolution to provide a selective advantage in dealing with looming objects.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call