Abstract

Data on sex-based disparities in children with kidney failure and outcomes after kidney transplantation are relatively sparse. This study examined the association between sex differences and the odds of receiving a pre-emptive living donor kidney transplantation, and post-transplant outcomes in children and adolescents. We studied all patients (aged <20years) who commenced kidney replacement therapy (KRT) between 2002 and 2017 using data from the ANZDATA Registry. Factors associated with graft loss and acute rejection after transplantation were assessed using multivariable Cox regression model. Differences in the odds of receiving a pre-emptive live donor transplant between sexes were assessed using adjusted logistic regression. Of the 757 children transplanted during the study period, 497 (65.7%) received a live donor kidney (163, 21.5% pre-emptive). In total, 168 (22.2%) patients experienced graft loss and 213 (28.1%) patients experienced a first episode of acute rejection during the median follow-up period of 6.9years (IQR 3.5-11.5years). There were no differences in the rates of graft loss or acute rejection by sex. Compared with boys, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) (95% confidence interval) for graft loss and acute rejection in girls were 0.97 (0.71-1.33) and 1.09 (0.82-1.44), respectively. Among children who received living donor kidney transplants, there were no sex differences in the odds of receiving a pre-emptive transplant (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.90 (95% CI 0.56-1.45)). No sex differences were observed in the odds of receiving a pre-emptive living donor kidney transplant or outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.